Metaphors and Emotions as Framing Strategies in Argumentation

ERVAS, FRANCESCA;GOLA, ELISABETTA;ROSSI, MARIA GRAZIA
2015-01-01

Abstract

The paper focuses on the role of both emotional and metaphorical processes in reasoning. The aim of the paper is to present an extension of the argumentative theory of reasoning proposed by Mercier and Sperber (2011). In order to advance an integrated model of the roles of metaphors and emotions in argumentation, the paper argues that it is possible to ascribe not only a negative role to emotions and metaphors, but also a positive one. Far from being just a source of fallacies in reasoning, indeed, both emotions and metaphors – considered as framing and reframing strategies – can play a constructive role in argumentation, by enhancing their creative power.
2015
Inglese
EuroAsianPacific Joint Conference on Cognitive Science
CEUR
Aachen
GERMANIA
Elena Andonova, et. al.
Gabriella Airenti, Bruno G. Bara, Giulio Sandini
1419
645
650
6
http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1419/paper0107.pdf
EuroAsianPacific Joint Conference on Cognitive Science
Esperti anonimi
September 25-27, 2015
Turin, Italy
internazionale
scientifica
Argumentation; Reasoning; Deliberation; Framing strategies; Metaphors; Emotions
no
4 Contributo in Atti di Convegno (Proceeding)::4.1 Contributo in Atti di convegno
Ervas, Francesca; Gola, Elisabetta; Rossi, MARIA GRAZIA
273
3
4.1 Contributo in Atti di convegno
open
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferencePaper
Files in This Item:
File Size Format  
Metaphor and Emotions as Framing Strategies.pdf

open access

Type: versione editoriale
Size 745.97 kB
Format Adobe PDF
745.97 kB Adobe PDF View/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Questionnaire and social

Share on:
Impostazioni cookie