Dogmatica e «criteri basilari» della storia dell’arte. Wölfflin negli scritti di Betti
Luca Vargiu
2021-01-01
Abstract
The relevance assigned by Betti to Wölfflin’s Grundbegriffe within the technical interpretation has not attracted the interest of scholars so far. The following pages try to offer a first analysis, according to the main points of Betti’s reading and the problems that emerge: Betti’s reception of Wölfflin’s “aisthetic” approach, the problem of formalism and the role played by the Grundbegriffe within the relationship between Problemgeschichte and Geistesgeschichte, the problem of the distinction between a “first” and a “second” Wölfflin, the question of the value freedom of art historiography.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
4588-Article Text-17492-1-10-20211021.pdf accesso aperto
Tipologia: versione editoriale
Dimensione 293.73 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
|
293.73 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.